AI Detector by Content at Scale

Charley Swift

Congratulations on the launch.

10 months ago

Gaylord Buckridge

Can you point me to someplace on your website that speaks about the end goal of the AI content checker (ethical purposes, catching misinformation, etc.)? How does this align with your AI content bypass services? I'm speaking about the dichotomy of services you are offering.

10 months ago

Michel Heathcote

I was excited to find it takes a few seconds to detect whether the content is created by humans!

11 months ago

Haleigh Bartoletti

Great job on developing AI Detector! The fact that this tool uses state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms to detect manipulated images is impressive. I appreciate the fact that this tool is designed to be accessible to both technical and non-technical users.

11 months ago

Elias Rowe

Congrats on your launch team

1 year ago

Blaze Koepp

This sounds super useful. Congrats on the launch!

1 year ago

Uriah Mayer

Nice tool! Seems like this will be more and more useful as days go by

1 year ago

Uriah Mayer

Do you require a higher credit score? Do you intend to raise your grade in school? Do you want to spy on a cheating partner? What'sapp, Facebook, Instagram, Facebook, or another social network? Do you require any database-related information? Do you require the recovery of deleted files? Are there any DMV or criminal records that need to be cleared? Do you want to delete any blogs or links to any websites? Do you want to recover lost, stolen or disabled social media? Then you should get in touch with this hacker Adrian Lamo at (hackwithadrianlamo @ gmail .com) because he is trustworthy and skilled.

1 year ago

Ayden Miller

And the product improvements keep on coming! A very handy tool indeed.

1 year ago

Kyleigh Luettgen

Vishal

1 year ago

Marcus Macejkovic

I've been using Content at Scale now for a couple of my own projects, with an eye toward how I could use it to create content for my clients, too. You know... be the guinea pig! I've tried several different AI content writers, including whichever one you're thinking about right now. They vary in quality - a lot. Many of them are very hard to work with, where you're essentially spoon-feeding it a few words and hoping to get a couple of sentences at a time. Some are easier to use but the output is just... off. Wooden and bland - that's probably the best description. So, when ChatGPT came out, I was pretty excited. Sure, it couldn't really do SEO writing, but at least it sounded way more human than the other tools. IF you could get on, right? But just when I was getting excited about its possibilities, then I heard about AI detectors. Having been in the content business since 2005, I've seen a lot of strategies, companies, and even industries come and go (and when they go, they tank!). The idea of building on sand stinks. A friend told me about Content at Scale - and that it's excellent for SEO AND that it's not detectable as AI. I had to try it out. I bought the smallest package possible (maybe 5 articles?). The content came back really solid - about 90% of the way there for publishing. (Pro tip: ALWAYS invest just a little more time to optimize the output and add that human touch.) Now I'm building out a content site that I plan to monetize. While some of my written content will be based on the podcast interviews I'm doing with subject matter experts, all of the other posts will be drafted by Content at Scale. I'd originally thought it would take me 3-4 months to get to just 20 articles posted, I'm currently publishing 3 per week. It's easy. It's fun. And I know going all-in on publishing works. Because this project is progressing quickly, it's easy to stay focused on it, too. TL;DR Content at Scale is excellent and well worth the price.

1 year ago

Jaylon Deckow

I've been testing various AI content detection tools and still don't understand their purpose. They are not grounded in any universal standards. They all make similar claims, but what are you really getting for your money? Indeed, there's such a sweeping difference in their scoring of given texts it's ridiculous. For example, take the following AI-produced text: An AI produced text by Type.ai: "Let's take a moment to consider the role of AI in photographic processing. As we all know, photography is a form of art that requires great skill and attention to detail. However, with the advent of AI technology, we have seen an increase in the use of automated processes for tasks like image enhancement and color correction. While some may argue that this takes away from the artistic integrity of photography, others believe that it allows for greater efficiency and consistency in output. At its core, AI in photographic processing is about finding a balance between these two approaches. With careful consideration and thoughtful implementation, it's possible to leverage the benefits of AI while still maintaining the unique qualities that make photography such a special and valuable art form." Content at Scale = 58% human Copyleaks = 99.9% AI Percent Human = 0% human GPTZero = Your text is likely to be written entirely by AI AICheatCheck = 100% certain the text was written by an AI Hive Moderation = 99.9% AI --- Changed with Hyperwrite’s “Writing Improver” tool and a rephrase recommeded by Grammarly. "Let us pause for a moment to contemplate artificial intelligence's role in photographic processing. Undoubtedly, photography constitutes an art form necessitating exceptional skill and meticulous attention to nuance. However, the advent of AI technology has ushered in a surge of automated methods for tasks such as image enhancement and color correction. While some may contend that this erodes the artistic integrity of photography, others maintain that it facilitates heightened efficiency and consistency in the final product. At its essence, AI in photographic processing seeks to strike a delicate equilibrium between these divergent perspectives. Through judicious evaluation and astute implementation, it is plausible to harness AI's advantages while preserving the distinctive qualities that render photography a profoundly cherished and invaluable art form." Content at Scale = 100% human Copyleaks = 20% human Percent Human = 100% human GPTZero = Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human AICheatCheck = 76% certain the text was generated by a Human Hive Moderation = 0% AI --- Now, this example may not prove anything, but it says something: it demonstrates that these AI detection tools are a waste of money and time because there are no standards by which to judge. It also shows that beating these detectors is pretty simple by rewriting text to provide one that passes the tools purported to help spot them.

1 year ago

Felipe Sanford

That is really useful!

1 year ago

Marcelo Prohaska

I've been dabbling with C@S, and its competitors - and having a free, comprehensive AI detector that not only alerts you to whether content appears written in AI (or just by a very bad writer) is a godsend, especially as it highlights, line by line, exactly where the biggest problems are.

1 year ago

Merl Orn

Thank you to Content at Scale for not only creating one of the best AI tools, but also for teaching frameworks (such as C.R.A.F.T.) that'll assist everyone in the content marketing industry in adapting to AI. I focus on topical + keyword strategy with my consulting clients, but I recently started my own blog, so I get to use Content at Scale a lot! I simply love it. Without the training videos you provide, transitioning to being an AIO writer will be much more difficult. I can't wait to see everything your team will accomplish!

1 year ago